By Firstdespatch Desk Apr 27, 2026
Agartala, Apr 27 (FD) A dispute over alleged irregularities in a recent recruitment examination has intensified in Tripura, drawing attention to concerns about fairness and transparency in the selection process. The issue centers on the Excise Sub-Inspector recruitment test conducted under Advertisement No. 11/2025 by the Tripura Public Service Commission.
The controversy came to light after Ranjit Debbarma, a Member of the Tripura Legislative Assembly, submitted a formal complaint to TPSC Chairman D K Chakma on April 27, 2026. In his letter, Debbarma flagged multiple discrepancies in both the question paper and the provisional answer key issued by the commission.
According to the complaint, several candidates identified errors in Question Nos. 22, 28, and 39, along with incorrect answers listed for Question Nos. 23, 26, 27, 36, 57, and 83. Debbarma warned that such inconsistencies could significantly undermine the integrity of the recruitment process and disadvantage deserving candidates.
The MLA urged the commission to conduct an immediate review and implement corrective measures. He specifically called for awarding grace marks to candidates affected by flawed questions and incorrect answer keys. Additionally, he raised objections to the existing fee structure, under which candidates must pay Rs. 100 per question to challenge discrepancies.
Highlighting the economic challenges faced by many aspirants in Tripura, particularly those from SC and ST communities, Debbarma described the objection fee as unfair and demanded its complete waiver. He also pressed for a refund of fees already collected and sought accountability for officials responsible for the alleged errors.
The issue has already gained traction following local media coverage, increasing public scrutiny on the commission. Responding briefly to the allegations, Chakma stated that the matter would be examined and further information would be shared accordingly.
As concerns grow among candidates, many are now looking to the commission for a transparent resolution to ensure that the recruitment process remains merit-based and free from procedural lapses. FD SB